麻豆APP

UNDT/2017/052

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Res judicata: Res judicata signifies that the same course of action cannot be adjudicated twice. For the stability of the judicial process, it is desirable that there is an end to litigation. Accordingly, the party who loses cannot relitigate his or her case. Remand: The fact that analogous cases of 14 fellow colleagues from UNDP based in India were remanded by the Appeals Tribunal to the Dispute Tribunal, further to their respective appeals, has no bearing with respect to the fact that the Dispute Tribunal’s judgment became final and non-appealable for those, such as the Applicants, who did not bring a timely appeal. The remand is a specific order by the Appeals Tribunal in a judgment ruling upon one or several specific appeals. Such a judgment applies strictly to exclusively those who had formally lodged an appeal.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicants contest a series of measures regarding their salary scales and entitlements taken further to the comprehensive Local Salary Survey conducted in India in June 2013. Since the applications were identical, the Tribunal joined them per employing organization. The Tribunal found that the applications were irreceivable since they had contested the exact same decision in previous applications that had been rejected by a judgment of the Dispute Tribunal. This judgment was never appealed before the Appeals Tribunal and, since the statutory time limit to appeal the concerned Dispute Tribunal’s judgment has expired, this ruling is no longer appealable. Hence, said ruling by the Dispute Tribunal became final as regards the Applicants and the matter is now res judicata.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Nath, Khanna, Joshi, Batra
Entity
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Applicable Law