UNDT/2015/091

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Abolishment of the Applicant��s post: The Tribunal concluded that the Applicant��s post in Jordan was indeed abolished and that the abolition was part of a genuine organizational restructuring. The Tribunal also concluded that the Administration acted fairly, justly and transparently in dealing with its staff members when they had to move back to Baghdad. The Applicant was provided with sufficient and written notice of the Respondent��s restructuring strategy.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to abolish her post in Amman and relocate it to Baghdad. She claimed that her rights were violated because the Respondent failed to provide her with notice of the abolition of her post, that the decision was verbal and that the post she encumbered was not abolished.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Al-Badri

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement