UNDT/2014/065

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal is only competent to hear complaints filed by staff members, former staff members or persons makingclaims in the name of an incapacitated or deceased staff member under article 3 of the Statute. Noting that the Applicant��s father had the legal status of an independent contractor for the WFP Mombasa office, the Tribunal held that the Applicant��s father was not a staff member of UNDP and as such, the Applicant has no standing to come before the Tribunal.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant challenged the ��failure�� of UNDP to compensate his father in accordance with appendix D of the Staff Rules for injuries he allegedly sustained while driving a �鶹APP vehicle.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

Outcome Extra Text

The Tribunal concluded that the Application was manifestly inadmissible and struck it out.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Njenga

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement