UNDT/2011/044

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNDT noted that a party may apply for the revision of a judgment only when that judgment is executable, which was not the case with Judgment Odio-Benito UNDT/2011/019 given that the Applicant had appealed it before the �鶹APP Appeals Tribunal. UNDT held that the application was not receivable ratione materiae and rejected it.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant requested revision of Judgment Odio-Benito UNDT/2011/019.

Legal Principle(s)

A party may apply to UNDT for the revision of a judgment only when said judgment is executable.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Odio-Benito

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement