麻豆APP

Rule 111.1(jj)

  • Article XI
  • Rule 101.2
  • Rule 106.1
  • Rule 11.1
  • Rule 110.1
  • Rule 110.3
  • Rule 111.1(a)
  • Rule 111.1(b)
  • Rule 111.1(gg)
  • Rule 111.1(hh)
  • Rule 111.1(ii)
  • Rule 111.1(jj)
  • Rule 111.2(a)
    • Showing 1 - 2 of 2
    2021-UNAT-1148, Secretary-General of IMO

    The Secretary-General of IMO is essentially seeking comments on the UNAT judgment under the guise of an application for interpretation, something UNAT expressly proscribed in Kasmani. The UNAT’s Fogarty Judgment clearly and unambiguously explicates the nature of the difficulty in a manner that requires no further interpretation. There is no ambiguity, uncertainty or irreconcilable conflict on the question remanded or the reasons for the remand or in the comments in paragraph 25 of the Fogarty Judgment that justifies an application for interpretation. While the applications for...

    2021-UNAT-1117, Margaret Mary Fogarty

    UNAT held that while the SAB may satisfy the requirements of a neutral first instance process, its decision is only advisory or recommendatory. UNAT held that the facts did not disclose whether the Secretary-General of IMO had the power to amend the powers of the SAB retrospectively to permit the SAB to make a decision rather than a recommendation or, more pertinently, by subsequent fiat, to convert a recommendation of SAB into a decision. UNAT held that the source of the Secretary-General’s power to introduce interim measures was not clear and that there may be other constraints upon his...