Security Council - Counter-Terrorism Committee (CTC) - Insight Briefing

CTED Insight Briefing explores emerging terrorist use of generative technologies and digital ecosystems

VSINGH67 — Mon, 08 Jun 2026 13:50:00 +0000

image_3.jpg

On 28 May 2026, the Counter‑Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate (CTED) hosted an Insight Briefing focusing on how terrorist groups exploit digital ecosystems. The briefing featured panellists from the Addressing Violent Extremism and Radicalization to Terrorism (AVERT) Research Network, an Australia-based member of CTED’s Global Research Network (GRN). More than 50 representatives from Member States and �鶹APP offices and agencies attended the event.

Mr. David Scharia, Director and Chief of Branch at CTED, opened the briefing by situating it within the ongoing review of the �鶹APP Global Counter‑Terrorism Strategy and underscored the timeliness of sharing with Member States emerging trends in terrorist use of digital spaces. He emphasized the value of the GRN, an informal group of more than 100 research institutions that connects research with policymakers.

Professor Michelle Grossman, founder of the AVERT Research Network, provided an overview of its multidisciplinary, policy-relevant research work. She highlighted AVERT’s work connecting researchers, policymakers, and communities to produce research on terrorism and violent extremism conducive to terrorism.

Mr. Ali Fisher, Fellow at ITSTIME Research Centre and Lecturer at the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore in Milan, analysed ISIL (Da’esh) and Al-Qaida strategic communications trajectories. He explained that current terrorist communication uses ecosystem-based distribution across multiple platforms simultaneously and recommended focusing on system-level disruption rather than relying on isolated platform takedowns.

Mr. Saif Tahir, Research Assistant and doctoral candidate at Victoria University of Wellington, examined propaganda pathways used by Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP). He described TTP as a sophisticated digital propagandist, noting that the group integrates generative artificial intelligence tools to produce new propaganda content and enhance existing images, videos, and translations. TTP coordinates bot networks across multiple messaging applications to expand its audience and improve operational resilience.

Mr. Felix Neumann, Policy Adviser at the Germany-based Konrad Adenauer Foundation, focused on nihilist violent extremism from a policy and law enforcement perspective, noting that such actors often view violence as the goal itself rather than a political means. He highlighted the need for clearer definitions by lawmakers, recognition of transnational online networks, and tailored policy responses.

The final speaker, Ms. Helen Young, Associate Professor at Deakin University and Australian Research Council Future Fellow, outlined Australian governmental and non‑governmental approaches to countering violent extremism conducive to terrorism in video‑gaming environments. She spoke further on a civil‑society pilot programme, entitled “Game Changers”, that engaged young gamers in co‑designing educational resources on online harms. She also emphasized that effective prevention requires a whole‑of‑society approach that involves gamers in building community resilience.

Facilitated by CTED’s Political Analysis and Research Unit, this briefing was part of CTED’s work on identifying emerging issues, trends and developments relating to countering terrorism, pursuant to Security Council resolutions 2617 (2021) and 2810 (2025) in close cooperation with academia, think tanks, and international, regional, and subregional organizations.

Front Page Article:

CTED hosts Insight Briefing on how propaganda ecosystems enable terrorist financing

AKHVEDELID — Fri, 24 Apr 2026 15:34:00 +0000

img_7788_copy.jpg

On 22 April 2026, the Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate (CTED) hosted an Insight Briefing by Adam Rousselle, an investigative analyst specializing in illicit and terrorist finance, on the topic of “Trust Networks and Parallel Financial Systems: How Propaganda Ecosystems Enable Terrorist Financing”. The briefing explored how terrorists manage to sustain their financing systems when formal financial institutions are inaccessible.

CTED’s Coordinator on Countering the Financing of Terrorism, Svetlana Martynova, highlighted the joint work of CTED with the Financial Action Task Force on examining the relevant trends, including in the context of the FATF 2025 Comprehensive Update on Terrorism Financing Risks. Ms. Martynova noted that for terrorist organizations, propaganda is often both a core activity and a significant expenditure. It serves multiple purposes, including expanding their support base, legitimizing their actions, and intimidating adversaries. In many cases, propaganda also aims to support financing efforts by recruiting donors and disseminating instructions on how to contribute financially. These finance-oriented communication campaigns may be carried out through a variety of channels, including social media platforms, messaging applications, traditional media, and in-person outreach.

In his presentation, Mr. Rousselle explained that terrorist financial activity is often only the visible endpoint of a much broader system. Long before funds are raised or transferred, networks are formed, relationships are built, and trust is established. In this sense, terrorist financing begins not with money, but with the conditions that make money move. At the center of this system lies a largely overlooked layer: the construction of credibility and connection. Through repeated interaction, shared narratives, and social validation, individuals and groups establish who can be trusted and who cannot. This process determines which actors are considered legitimate enough to coordinate, fundraise, or facilitate operations. Without this foundation, financial activity cannot scale or sustain itself.

Digital platforms have transformed how this trust is built. What may appear as propaganda or ideological messaging often serves a deeper function. Across social media, messaging applications, and online publications, content is used not only to persuade, but to create relationships between actors who would otherwise remain disconnected. Carefully produced media soliciting donations for terrorist groups —consistent branding, structured layouts, and professional visuals—signals competence and stability to their supporters. These signals reduce uncertainty and make targeted audiences more likely to engage, support, and ultimately contribute financially.

Over time, these systems have evolved from more centralized structures to increasingly decentralized and distributed models. In earlier configurations, hierarchy enforced coordination. Today, as networks fragment and spread across regions and platforms, trust replaces hierarchy as the primary organizing mechanism. This shift has significant implications. Decentralized systems are more resilient, harder to disrupt, and capable of regenerating even after targeted interventions. When one part of the network is removed, the underlying trust relationships often persist and reconfigure elsewhere.

Current counter-terrorism financing efforts remain largely focused on detecting transactions after they occur. While necessary, this approach is inherently reactive. It addresses the symptoms rather than the system itself. By the time financial activity becomes visible, the underlying network is already established and capable of adapting to disruption. As long as that network remains intact, new channels and methods can replace those that are removed.

Addressing this challenge requires a shift in focus. Rather than concentrating solely on financial flows, efforts must move upstream to identify and understand the systems that enable them. This means mapping how trust is formed, how it spreads across platforms, and how it connects actors within and across networks. It also requires integrating behavioral, financial, and network data into a more coherent analytical framework, allowing earlier identification of risk before transactions occur.

Facilitated by CTED’s Political Analysis and Research Unit, this briefing is part of CTED’s work on identifying emerging issues, trends and developments relating to countering terrorism, pursuant to Security Council resolutions 2395 (2017) and 2617 (2021), in close cooperation with academia, think tanks, and international, regional, and subregional organizations.

Additional Resources:

Front Page Article:

CTED Insight Briefing brings technology-driven counter-terrorism into focus

BMUSONI — Fri, 31 Mar 2023 22:31:00 +0000

img_1791_copy.jpg

On 27 March 2023, CTED hosted an Insight Briefing on the blind spots in technology-driven counter-terrorism decision-making processes and proposed methods to mitigate these blind spots. CTED/Vijai Singh-Persaud

The use of predictive technologies to improve counter-terrorism initiatives, and more specifically border security, was the focus of CTED’s latest Insight Briefing, which was held on 27 March 2023.

One of the main takeaways of the Briefing was that while predictive and probabilistic algorithms, human and signals intelligence, big data analytics, and facial recognition capabilities offer opportunities for Member States’ efforts to address the scourge of terrorism, they also present some challenges.

Noting the Security Council’s guidance in its resolution 2396 (2017) on the benefits of biometrics in counter-terrorism, as well as on the need to improve standards for the use and collection of biometric data in counter-terrorism, the limitations in technology-driven counter-terrorism were outlined and recommendations for mitigating them provided.

During his opening remarks, David Scharia, Director, and Head of the Technical Expertise and Research Branch of CTED, noted that the Briefing was aimed at assisting Member States in identifying methods to improve technology-assisted decision-making processes in the context of counter-terrorism.

The Briefing featured a presentation from Professor Shiri Krebs, Professor of Law, Deakin University, Australia, and a member of CTED’s Global Research Network. The presentation, entitled “Fact and Fiction in Technology-Driven Technology”, detailed how counter-terrorism efforts in the context of airport and border security had increasingly evolved towards preventative counter-terrorism. The benefit of predictive and probabilistic technologies lies in their ability to provide vast amounts of immediate, relevant information, immediately process this information, and identify connections and inconsistencies.

Professor Krebs noted, however, that attempts to prevent terrorist attacks through the identification of suspicious individuals, including from data collected in terrorism watch lists and databases and from law enforcement cooperation, could create false predictions about people and incorrectly assess the risk they pose. This could, in turn, negatively affect the principles of human rights, equality, and privacy, to name just a few. During her presentation, Professor Krebs also explained how technological limitations, limitations surrounding humans’ use of technology and cognitive biases could cause decision-making errors in counter-terrorism risk assessments.

Concluding with a few suggestions for improving predictive counter-terrorism, Professor Krebs cited the need to develop transparent data practices and decision-assisting technologies, develop strengthened and clarified evidentiary standards, and provide capacity-building trainings to assist in de-biasing national and international decision makers.

Front Page Article: