麻豆APP

A/RES/70/244

  • 10th - 1955
  • 11th - 1956
  • 12th - 1957
  • 13th - 1958
  • 7th - 1952
  • A/RES/1/13
  • A/RES/13(I)
  • A/RES/217 (III)
  • A/RES/22(I)A
  • A/RES/258/III
  • A/RES/2688(XXV)
  • A/RES/3042(XXVII)
  • A/RES/31/126
  • A/RES/31/240
  • A/RES/32/253
  • A/RES/33/142
  • A/RES/33/143
  • A/RES/3357(XXIX)
  • A/RES/35/210
  • A/RES/37/126
  • A/RES/39/246
  • A/RES/39/27
  • A/RES/43/226
  • A/RES/44/198
  • A/RES/45/259
  • A/RES/470-V
  • A/RES/48/218
  • A/RES/48/218B
  • A/RES/49/241
  • A/RES/50/11
  • A/RES/51/217
  • A/RES/51/226
  • A/RES/51/241
  • A/RES/51/243
  • A/RES/52/234
  • A/RES/53/221
  • A/RES/53/253
  • A/RES/54
  • A/RES/54/244
  • A/RES/55/159
  • A/RES/55/232
  • A/RES/55/258
  • A/RES/57/226
  • A/RES/57/305
  • A/RES/58/254
  • A/RES/59
  • A/RES/59/272
  • A/RES/59/283
  • A/RES/59/287
  • A/RES/59/289
  • A/RES/59/296
  • A/RES/594(VI)
  • A/RES/61/240
  • A/RES/61/244
  • A/RES/61/251
  • A/RES/61/261
  • A/RES/61/262
  • A/RES/61/822
  • A/RES/62/228
  • A/RES/62/253
  • A/RES/62/63
  • A/RES/63/228
  • A/RES/63/250
  • A/RES/63/250/Paragraph 23
  • A/RES/63/252
  • A/RES/63/253
  • A/RES/63/259
  • A/RES/64/110
  • A/RES/64/233
  • A/RES/64/269
  • A/RES/64/289
  • A/RES/65/247
  • A/RES/65/247/Paragraph 50
  • A/RES/65/248
  • A/Res/66/106
  • A/RES/66/237
  • A/RES/66/264
  • A/RES/67
  • A/RES/67/241
  • A/RES/67/257
  • A/RES/68/253
  • A/RES/68/254
  • A/RES/68/268
  • A/RES/68/291
  • A/RES/69/203
  • A/RES/69/204
  • A/RES/69/251
  • A/RES/69/302
  • A/RES/70/112
  • A/RES/70/170
  • A/RES/70/244
  • A/RES/71/263
  • A/RES/71/266
  • A/RES/72/254
  • A/RES/72/255
  • A/RES/72/290
  • A/RES/73/236
  • A/RES/73/273
  • A/RES/73/276
  • A/RES/73/278
  • A/RES/73/315
  • A/RES/74
  • A/RES/74/255
  • A/RES/74/255A-B
  • A/RES/74/263
  • A/RES/75/248
  • A/RES/76(I)
  • A/RES/76/240
  • A/RES/76/242
  • A/RES/77/114
  • A/RES/77/256 A-B
  • A/RES/77/260
  • A/RES/973(X)
    • Showing 11 - 11 of 11
    UNDT/2020/039, Nicholas

    Receivability In Lloret Alca?iz et al. 2018-UNAT-840, the Appeals Tribunal specifically addressed the issue of receivability of applications contesting, directly or indirectly, regulatory decisions of the General Assembly. Like in the present case, the applicants in Lloret Aclaniz et al. argued that they were not challenging the decision of the General Assembly to introduce a new Unified Salary Scale but rather the implementation of this new scale by the Secretary-General in their individual cases, who failed to take into account their acquired rights. The applications were found to be...